For fixed integers
(Recall, A the girth of a graph is the length of its shortest cycle, and it’s regular if all its vertices have the same degree)
Problem (Hoffman-Singleton): Find a useful constraint on the relationship between
Note: Excluding trivial Moore graphs with girth
The solution to the problem shows that there are only a few cases left to check.
Solution: It is easy to show that the minimum number of vertices of a Moore graph of girth

This is the tree example for , but the argument should be clear for any from the branching pattern of the tree:
Provided
Let
since each vertex has degree . if is an edge of , since any walk of length 2 from to would be able to use such an edge and create a cycle of length 3 which is less than the girth. if is not an edge, because (using the tree idea above), every two vertices non-adjacent vertices have a unique neighbor in common.
Let
We use this matrix equation to generate two equations whose solutions will restrict
Multiply the matrices in the equation above by any
Rearranging and factoring out
Say that
From this equation you can easily derive that
Implying that
Discussion: This is a strikingly clever use of spectral graph theory to answer a question about combinatorics. Spectral graph theory is precisely that, the study of what linear algebra can tell us about graphs. For an deeper dive into spectral graph theory, see the guest post I wrote on With High Probability.
If you allow for even girth, there are a few extra (infinite families of) Moore graphs, see Wikipedia for a list.
With additional techniques, one can also disprove the existence of any Moore graphs that are not among the known ones, with the exception of a possible Moore graph of girth
- The graph is not vertex-transitive
- Its automorphism group has size at most 375
You should go out and find it or prove it doesn’t exist.
Hungry for more applications of linear algebra to combinatorics and computer science? The book Thirty-Three Miniatures is a fantastically entertaining book of linear algebra gems (it’s where I found the proof in this post). The exposition is lucid, and the chapters are short enough to read on my daily train commute.
Want to respond? Send me an email, post a webmention, or find me elsewhere on the internet.